|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Psychology & Self-Improvement
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Sunday, 12 July 2009 00:00 |
If you're a busy person, let go of the myth of "catching up." You won't ever catch up. Or, even if you do, you'll be "behind" again before long. I suggest more positive and attainable goals such as being efficient, having clear priorities and being timely. But trying to be "caught up" sounds like preparing for a life where there is no longer any motion or activity. Is that even what you really want? It stands to reason that if you're having a hard time "catching up" you're a busy person, and you're probably like that because you prefer activity. You would not relish boredom. At any rate, going by the principle that it's all in your attitude, and how you look at things, "I must catch up" is one of those notions that leads to more stress without any real results. I recommend discarding it. |
|
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Society & Culture
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Saturday, 11 July 2009 00:00 |
|
The Three Biggest--And Most Enduring--Human Errors:
1. Religion
2. Socialism
3. Marriage
Their Alternatives, Rarely Conceived and Less Often Practiced:
1. Rationality
2. Individual rights
3. Love |
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Psychology & Self-Improvement
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Friday, 10 July 2009 00:00 |
|
The depressed person said to the happy person: "This isn't all there is. This can't be all there is!"
The happy person replied: "What else would there be?" |
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Society & Culture
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Thursday, 09 July 2009 00:00 |
|
The short case against the Democrat-Republican, Big Government welfare state is this: Rational and free human beings do not operate by force, or under the threat of force. The only restraint that rational, free people impose on each other is to abstain from the initiation of force or fraud. Government must enforce this right--but this is ALL government may enforce. Most would acknowledge it's crazy to settle routine or even more serious disputes by force of arms. Imagine if every disagreement you had with your neighbor over noise or trash cans, or every dispute with your spouse or child, were to be settled with a fight to the death. Imagine if you could jail anyone with whom you disagree, or any potential customer who refused to buy your product, or any potential employer who declined to hire you for a job. This would all clearly be crazy. Yet this is precisely what we authorize our government to do, on our behalf. If someone by law owes 20 percent, or 70 percent, of his income to the government, he is put in jail if he refuses to pay it. If he tries to escape from jail, he'll be shot and killed. When we say that the Big Government welfare state created by the United States of America is backed up by coercion and force--it's an objective fact. If you're for government as we know it--either for its maintenance or for its expansion--then you're for operating by the rule of force. You might not think so, or you might not like to think so--but you are.
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 125 |